This year, my band otherfather released three singles. One of those was added to a botted playlist.
Here’s what it looks like on your Spotify for Artists dashboard when that happens:
And here’s how it’s fucking up the record that we’ve spent six years creating.
Our second single had been performing fairly well.
The song features a verse from Mr. Muthafuckin’ eXquire (get his new album, by the way), an underground legend. He’s got enough of a name that we got good streams right out of the gate — we did a few Facebook ads, but we didn’t do much more in terms of promotion.
We’d gotten comfortably past 1,000 streams, so we were celebrating.
Why? Well, Spotify does not pay at all if your song gets fewer than 1,000 streams in a year, so while it’s an arbitrary threshold, it’s an important one for extremely small artists.
And when that second huge jump happened, we thought we were looking at an inclusion on a major playlist. We were pumped — for about three seconds, until we realized that our tunes were only popular with robots (and not in, like, a good way).
You can see exactly how that played out here in these screenshots from our group chat:

As you can see, we figured out almost immediately that we were on a fake playlist.
Now, those of you who aren’t in music, you’re probably wondering: What’s a fake playlist?
Shady companies put together playlists and have fake accounts “listen” to the songs. That pushes up the stream count for artists’ music, and the Spotify algorithm then promotes that music to other listeners (even if they didn’t listen to the original fake playlist).
It’s a scummy practice, though it seems to be something the major labels do constantly. We’ve never used it.
We immediately reported this to Spotify:
Later that day, the playlist got taken down:
All good, right?
A few months later, we had a second jump from another fake playlist.
This is not uncommon; here’s a whole Reddit thread with artists talking about how they got added to playlists that were clearly full of bots.
Aw, hell, why provide one link when you could provide a bunch? Here’s other threads talking about this issue:
- Music getting removed AGAIN because of being added to botted playlists, this is getting ridiculous.
- Got my song put on a botted playlist. What do I do?
- Song got added to botted playlist without consent
- Spotify’s anti-bot system seems to be punishing small artists instead of scam playlisters. This is my favorite one, because the top comment is just “Fuck Spotify.”
This is a widespread problem, and if you are an indie musician, it will happen to you when your music starts to get a decent number of real streams.
I could go into why this happens more frequently to small artists who are starting to grow their fan bases, but I’ll save that because it’s only really interesting to artists who are promoting their music, and most of those folks will already understand the basics of how listening algorithms work.
But it’s easy to find hundreds of stories of musicians who have ended up on botted playlists without their consent.
This week, we’ve been preparing to finally release this record.
We’ve been working on it for six years, and it’s a deeply personal work. It is about grief and mental health issues.
It’s weird, big, and outside of our comfort zones. So when we finally sent it off to mastering, we were psyched — then, this week, we got this email from our distributor:
Greetings from the CD Baby Team,
We were recently notified by Spotify that they have found irregular streaming patterns associated with a release distributed via your CD Baby account. This pattern has been identified as unusual, artificial, or manipulated streaming activity, which violates the terms of most digital music services. The quantity of these streams was significant enough that, to prevent further complaints or additional financial penalties, we have removed the release from Spotify and noted your account that this release is ineligible for redelivery to this partner.
One, but not the only, source of irregular streaming is companies that employ misleading techniques such as fake accounts, playlists, or bots, to inflate streaming numbers. If you have employed a marketing service that guaranteed you plays or playlist placement, or a marketing service that claimed to work with Spotify to guarantee these results, then it is likely that the promotional services you used caused these artificial streams. We know that many people employ these services believing them to be legitimate, but continued use of such services could jeopardize your entire catalog.
We are also aware that this streaming activity may have happened without your permission or knowledge. Going forward, we encourage you to use the tools in your Spotify for Artists account to monitor your catalog and report any suspicious playlists to Spotify.
Because the quantity of these streams was significant, you may have already incurred one or more “artificial streams penalty fee(s).” If CD Baby was charged a fine for distributing your content that was fraudulently streamed, this fee will be passed on to you per section 4(c) of the CD Baby Artist Agreement, and will be posted to your CD Baby account.
To learn more about artificial streaming, please review this help center article: What happens if I use a service that promises more streams, or I play my own music on repeat?
Thank You,
CD Baby
There’s a lot here that pisses me off.
First of all, artists: CD Baby does not have your back in any way. There’s no mechanism to dispute this accusation or to try to restore the song to Spotify if it gets removed. By default, they side with the billionaires who are telling you that your music is worthless unless you get 1,000 streams.
Secondly, CDBaby is passing on Spotify’s “irregular streaming” fine to us.
Spotify announced that fine last year. It’s not much; it’s like $10 or so.
The idea is that it only applies to tracks that receive 90% of their listens through “irregular” sources; we were added to two playlists, which was enough to throw us over that threshold.
That policy is defensible if there’s a mechanism to dispute the accusation — but there isn’t. You can send them an email, and they’ll say they opened a ticket; we did that a few weeks ago and heard nothing.
Third, I’m annoyed by this sentence — and this is the big one, for me:
“Going forward, we encourage you to use the tools in your Spotify for Artists account to monitor your catalog and report any suspicious playlists to Spotify.”
Well, we did exactly that. We’ve got chat logs. We even offered CDBaby full access to our group chat to verify that we didn’t alter our own conversations from several months ago (that’s weird, I know, but we were desperate to fix this problem; desperate enough to lead a customer service representative through months of fart jokes and bad puns).
We filled out the damned paperwork. We did that because we worked hard on this record and we wanted the streaming numbers to be accurate.
But here’s the thing: It’s not our fucking job to police Spotify.
We can’t take down playlists that feature our music. We can only report them — which we did, promptly — but we shouldn’t even have that responsibility.
We are three guys with limited budgets. We have spent thousands of dollars on mastering, studio time, equipment, etc. for this record. And that’s pretty cheap!
For that investment, we stood to make about $11 from Spotify for “Family Pictures.” We cannot watch Spotify’s live counts all day for potential issues — though when we found them, we did report them.
And where does our responsibility end?
Should we also check our Apple Music accounts for bots? Tidal? Amazon Music? Fucking Deezer?
Spotify has billions of dollars to spend fighting this problem (assuming that it is a problem, given that the company’s messaging about their payout policies is intentionally vague).
But here’s the thing: They don’t have any financial incentive to fix the AI bot issue. If they simply refuse payout for every artist affected, they’re only screwing indie musicians. And indie musicians can’t afford to fight back.
The “90% threshold” ensures that their policy will never hit a major label artist (and I’m guessing that if it did, the label would have a way to reverse the removal). They don’t pay for songs that get fewer than 1,000 streams, despite still making money off of those songs — and now, they don’t have to pay for songs that go above that threshold, either.
I believe that this policy is intentionally aimed at small artists.
The problem is that the 90% threshold sounds fair, but it’s extremely easy to reach, particularly small-time bands who aren’t paying for Facebook/Instagram ads.
We might get a few thousand listens on a well-crafted collaboration with a well-known artist. But a botted playlist could deliver a few thousand streams in a day — hitting that 90% threshold, triggering Spotify’s anti-spam protection, and obliterating music from the world’s most popular streaming service.
If someone really hated a fellow local artist, they could spend about $10 to eliminate any other local artist’s song from Spotify.
That’s only true if an artist is already fairly small. If I put a Taylor Swift song on a botted playlist, I would need to spend millions of dollars to reach the 90% threshold and get one of her songs penalized. For our band, it would cost a few bucks.
And because Spotify has such a near-monopoly on modern listeners, our entire release is now slightly fucked.
The other songs on our record won’t get the juice from our legitimately promoted single. We will not reach Spotify’s payment thresholds.
And if we come close, I expect that we will be fined again for being on playlists that we had no control over.
If I were conspiratorial (and I’m not), I’d also note that there’s nothing to stop Spotify from algorithmically sending fake streams of their own to artists who come near the payment threshold. Since they’ve changed their policy, they have a strong incentive to stop indie artists from reaching 1,000 annual streams.
But that’s ridiculous — Spotify would never do something that shitty to small artists and oh hey why is this sentence a hyperlink, I wonder?
What I’m trying to say is that Spotify cares about music, so they’d never do something unethical that would prioritize artless trash and it’s happening again, why do these sentences keep turning into hyperlinks?
And yeah, Spotify isn’t perfect, but it’s not like they’re funding robot genocides oh hey it happened again.
Our distributor, CD Baby, made no attempt to act in our defense.
They’ve made it clear that any fine will be passed on to our account, so if we get fined, we’ll only need about, oh, 5,000 additional streams to pay it off (and those streams cannot come from our lead single).
CD Baby has also indicated that they may remove the song, which is the centerpiece of our record.
Our album has musical motifs that will make less sense with that song removed. The intro, for example, uses a leftover string part from Family Pictures. If the song is gone, that intro will now lose context.
To be clear, this now means that if you use Spotify, you may not be able to listen to our album as it was intended to be heard. And that fucking sucks, because most of you use Spotify.
So, what do we do now?
I guess we’ll just drop the album on Bandcamp or something. Here it is.

If only one of you buys it, we’ll make more than we’d ever make from Spotify. But if we were doing this for money, we’d be doing something else.
Music pays shit; we’ve spent hundreds of hours on this record because we wanted you to hear it. Dropping it like this is a bitter pill to swallow.
This was supposed to be a very good day. It kinda sucks now.
So, please, listen on Bandcamp, and if you dig it, buy it. If you can, delete Spotify and switch to another app. They all do the same thing, unless you really like listening to Joe Rogan.
And failing that, spread the word: No streaming service pays well, but Spotify is particularly bad for small artists. They pretend to be boosters, but they just use the same “you should just do it for the exposure!” logic that every pay-to-play venue uses.
Those venues all close eventually.
Fuck Spotify, fuck CDBaby, and please enjoy our record.